IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-29 Country: USA
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 29 7 2 9 0.310 0.0389 0.0389 0.0980 0.0980
2018-19 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 47 13 14 27 0.575 0.0721 0.0683 0.1814 0.1719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA — 0 4 11 15 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45380
Forward overall
#2428
Forward born in 1998
#2622
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Bodin
0.20
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Alfred Rotiroti
0.29
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Jake Laville
0.23
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Billy Hartnett
0.18
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

James Devlin
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Émile Tremblay
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Kontir
Lebanon Valley · 2023-24
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.