IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Carpentier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 10 3 2 5 0.500 0.0654 0.0677 0.1697 0.1758
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 44 24 31 55 1.250 0.5096 0.5096 1.0048 1.0048
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 28 14 14 28 1.000 0.4077 0.4077 0.8038 0.8038
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 27 2 7 9 0.333
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC GR 26 8 6 14 0.538
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC SR 31 9 8 17 0.548
2021-22 Yale D1 ECAC JR 26 8 5 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · Yale
+762.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
98%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4624
Forward overall
#187
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Heffner
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon McMartin
Canton · 2011-12
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Crowther
Post · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.