← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Heffner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0373 0.0422 0.1028 0.1163
2007-08 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 48 1 3 4 0.083 0.0279 0.0300 0.0771 0.0830
2008-09 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 52 7 22 29 0.558 0.1871 0.1936 0.5161 0.5339
2009-10 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 55 4 18 22 0.400 0.1342 0.1320 0.3702 0.3640
2010-11 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 57 1 14 15 0.263 0.0883 0.0822 0.2436 0.2267
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 11 0 5 5 0.455
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 15 2 3 5 0.333
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 16 1 4 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2011-12 · Wentworth
+224.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13738
Defenseman overall
#1511
Defenseman born in 1990
#1626
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.