IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 53 19 26 45 0.849 0.3272 0.2999 1.2357 1.1327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 7 12 19 0.613
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 6 11 17 0.567
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 8 15 23 0.742
2002-03 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 15 1 3 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2002-03 · St. Norbert
+3.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14661
Forward overall
#443
Forward born in 1981
#555
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.