icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | St. Michael's Buzzers | OJHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Mississauga Chargers | OJHL | 27 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.296 | 0.0726 | 0.0741 | 0.2028 | 0.2071 |
| 2013-14 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 27 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.148 | 0.0321 | 0.0296 | 0.1146 | 0.1057 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | SR | 24 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2016-17 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | JR | 18 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.500 |
| 2015-16 | Canton | D3 | — | SO | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.429 |
| 2014-15 | Canton | D3 | — | FR | 20 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.600 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.