IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Briggs Gammill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berkshire School NE-Prep 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0457 0.0457 0.1052 0.1052
2019-20 Berkshire School NE-Prep 30 22 18 40 1.333 0.2641 0.2641 0.6075 0.6075
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 7 2 9 11 1.571 0.6407 0.6407 1.2631 1.2631
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC SR 30 3 4 7 0.233
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC JR 28 8 7 15 0.536
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC SO 32 4 10 14 0.438
2021-22 Yale D1 ECAC FR 27 3 9 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2021-22 · Yale
+193.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21153
Forward overall
#1036
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Doug Lindensmith
Norwich · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2022-23
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2000-01
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.