IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Gorman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0226 0.0226 0.0366 0.0366
2019-20 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 6 11 17 0.607 0.1713 0.1713 0.2778 0.2778
2021-22 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 11 34 45 1.875 0.5289 0.5289 0.8580 0.8580
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 34 13 9 22 0.647
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 30 12 14 26 0.867
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 29 7 17 24 0.828
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 31 5 14 19 0.613
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2022-23 · Princeton
+85.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15696
Forward overall
#771
Forward born in 2003
#106
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Howie
Marian · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Rose
Elmira · 2000-01
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Swallow
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2002-03
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.