IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Lie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-27 Country: Norway
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0204 0.0216 0.0494 0.0522
2023-24 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 48 3 13 16 0.333 0.1306 0.1316 0.4094 0.4126
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 37 1 16 17 0.460
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2024-25 · Ferris State
+141.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12878
Defenseman overall
#2582
Defenseman born in 2005
#2548
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Fernley
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.