IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Márton Nemes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-23 Country: Hungary
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 HC Slavia Praha U20 USHL-Style-Czech 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Mora IK U20 SHL-J20 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 47 13 12 25 0.532 0.2099 0.2141 0.7224 0.7368
2024-25 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 35 8 9 17 0.486 0.1917 0.1859 0.6596 0.6395
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA — 39 4 9 13 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Bentley
+97.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21391
Forward overall
#1167
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2010-11
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Weaver
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.