← New Search ↗ Social Card

Márton Nemes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-23 Country: Hungary
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 HC Slavia Praha U20 USHL-Style-Czech 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Mora IK U20 SHL-J20 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 47 13 12 25 0.532 0.2084 0.2126 0.6533 0.6663
2024-25 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 35 8 9 17 0.486 0.1903 0.1845 0.5966 0.5784
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA 39 4 9 13 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Bentley
+98.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21239
Forward overall
#1158
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2013-14
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.