IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Gilbert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Long Beach Sharks NA3HL 38 4 9 13 0.342 0.0378 0.0378 0.1084 0.1084
2021-22 Long Beach Sharks NA3HL 47 5 11 16 0.340 0.0376 0.0370 0.1078 0.1061
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 37 4 5 9 0.243 0.0356 0.0345 0.1192 0.1156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20027
Defenseman overall
#3283
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Fusaro
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Cooper
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Lyke
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.