IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Fusaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 44 4 7 11 0.250 0.0919 0.0905 0.2639 0.2599
2009-10 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 58 8 10 18 0.310 0.1140 0.1077 0.3275 0.3093
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 21 0 4 4 0.191
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 4 2 6 0.240
2010-11 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2010-11 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+334.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43692
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1989
#4822
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Perez
New England College · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Cohen
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.