← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Greco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 35 1 3 4 0.114 0.0143 0.0143 0.0361 0.0361
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHLP 38 9 16 25 0.658 0.0755 0.0746 0.1483 0.1466
2022-23 Seahawks Hockey EHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0767 0.1631 0.1625
2023-24 Seahawks Hockey EHL 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0355 0.0336 0.0753 0.0712
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 20 1 2 3 0.150

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41372
Forward overall
#2628
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2018-19
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.