IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Jenion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-24 Country: England
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.0349 0.0338 0.1051 0.1018
2018-19 — NAHL 42 1 9 10 0.238 0.0846 0.0785 0.2511 0.2329
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 2 6 8 0.286
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 20 1 6 7 0.350
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 7 1 0 1 0.143
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 27 7 1 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2019-20 · Trine
+418.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17462
Defenseman overall
#2576
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Hughes
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan MacIntyre
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Thomas
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.