← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Toews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Austin Ice Bats NA3HL 47 10 16 26 0.553 0.0694 0.0720 0.1746 0.1812
2022-23 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 40 13 6 19 0.475 0.0621 0.0617 0.1612 0.1603
2023-24 NA3HL 37 15 13 28 0.757 0.0950 0.0897 0.2389 0.2256
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839
2024-25 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839
2023-24 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839
2022-23 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839
2021-22 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839
2020-21 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 11 15 26 0.839

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35415
Forward overall
#2169
Forward born in 2003
#1536
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.