← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas LaVigne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 40 2 7 9 0.225 0.0282 0.0291 0.0710 0.0733
2022-23 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 41 3 7 10 0.244 0.0306 0.0302 0.0770 0.0761
2023-24 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 37 0 3 3 0.081 0.0106 0.0100 0.0275 0.0259
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 22 2 4 6 0.273

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27643
Defenseman overall
#4180
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Assumption · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2023-24
0.067 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.