← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rory Neish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Elite 40 16 31 47 1.175 0.2064 0.2064 0.2692 0.2692
2021-22 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Elite 40 13 49 62 1.550 0.2723 0.2529 0.3551 0.3298
2022-23 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 46 10 26 36 0.783 0.1800 0.1660 0.2479 0.2286
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 29 15 18 33 1.138

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25888
Forward overall
#1460
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.