IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaycob McCombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0619 0.0635 0.1765 0.1811
2012-13 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 42 8 7 15 0.357 0.1326 0.1294 0.3781 0.3689
2013-14 — NAHL 56 9 8 17 0.304 0.1127 0.1043 0.3215 0.2975
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 6 9 15 0.600
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 6 5 11 0.440
2015-16 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2014-15 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 28 8 13 21 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2014-15 · Hamline
+666.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33351
Forward overall
#1325
Forward born in 1993
#4123
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Mahlmeister
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sundgren
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Brandrup
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.