← New Search ↗ Social Card

Baz Schuehle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Two Rivers USHS-MN 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0203 0.0203 0.0389 0.0389
2020-21 Two Rivers USHS-MN 20 7 7 14 0.700 0.0886 0.0886 0.1700 0.1700
2022-23 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 47 8 14 22 0.468 0.0587 0.0607 0.1478 0.1528
2023-24 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 41 7 21 28 0.683 0.0857 0.0845 0.2156 0.2126
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 24 4 10 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2020-21 · University of Alabama
+3252.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37108
Forward overall
#2331
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2017-18
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2022-23
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.