IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Goodman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 31 0 3 3 0.097 0.0223 0.0228 0.0307 0.0313
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 34 1 4 5 0.147 0.0338 0.0329 0.0466 0.0453
2024-25 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0460 0.0423 0.0634 0.0583
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 18 3 5 8 0.444

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60123
Forward overall
#4364
Forward born in 2004
#5008
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niklas Miller
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Wilhelm
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas McDiarmid
Lawrence · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.