← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Goodman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 31 0 3 3 0.097 0.0121 0.0123 0.0306 0.0312
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 34 1 4 5 0.147 0.0185 0.0180 0.0464 0.0451
2024-25 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0251 0.0231 0.0631 0.0581
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 NCHC 18 3 5 8 0.444

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60450
Forward overall
#4369
Forward born in 2004
#5007
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.