IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Barr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 45 20 49 69 1.533 0.1924 0.1975 0.4841 0.4969
2024-25 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 52 11 17 28 0.538 0.2195 0.2173 0.4328 0.4284
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 18 2 5 7 0.389

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12914
Forward overall
#632
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Fauchoux
Concordia · 2013-14
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Hesse
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Sansone
Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.