IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Spear Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 44 19 24 43 0.977 0.1227 0.1243 0.3085 0.3126
2024-25 — NA3HL 31 13 20 33 1.065 0.1336 0.1284 0.3361 0.3230
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 30 11 9 20 0.667

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23155
Forward overall
#1285
Forward born in 2004
#574
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Manoukian
Endicott · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaiah Bennis
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Jewett
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.