IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Driscoll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Elite 39 2 5 7 0.179 0.0315 0.0313 0.0411 0.0409
2023-24 — NA3HL 31 1 7 8 0.258 0.0594 0.0588 0.0818 0.0809
2024-25 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 42 0 9 9 0.214 0.0493 0.0462 0.0679 0.0636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 30 2 4 6 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26324
Defenseman overall
#4150
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Paluch
Trinity · 2021-22
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Baetsen
Adrian · 2017-18
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.