IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nelson Wodarz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-31 Country: USA
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 26 1 11 12 0.462 0.0584 0.0584 0.1121 0.1121
2022-23 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 26 6 14 20 0.769 0.0974 0.0974 0.1868 0.1868
2023-24 — NA3HL 34 1 6 7 0.206 0.0258 0.0263 0.0650 0.0663
2024-25 — NA3HL 32 0 9 9 0.281 0.0353 0.0342 0.0888 0.0860
2025-26 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 32 0 6 6 0.188 0.0235 0.0216 0.0592 0.0543
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25954
Defenseman overall
#4063
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Owen Atkinson
0.18
actual FR PPG at Post
Ryan Cardow
0.31
actual FR PPG at Post
Max Beaulac
0.12
actual FR PPG at Post
Michael Montague
0.17
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Herbert
Marian · 2005-06
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Thomas
SUNY Brockport · 2002-03
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Erhart
Becker · 2010-11
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.