IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Erhart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 24 11 7 18 0.750 0.1277 0.1240 0.3179 0.3086
2010-11 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 46 15 20 35 0.761 0.1296 0.1190 0.3225 0.2960
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Becker D3 — SR 21 0 6 6 0.286
2013-14 Becker D3 — JR 24 1 10 11 0.458
2012-13 Becker D3 — SO 21 2 2 4 0.191
2011-12 Becker D3 — FR 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2011-12 · Becker
-34.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39056
Forward overall
#1400
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Brandrup
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Mahlmeister
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Servizzi
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.