IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eiji Hofmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-19 Country: USA
New England College
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lakeville South USHS-MN 30 5 3 8 0.267 0.0338 0.0338 0.0648 0.0648
2023-24 Lakeville South USHS-MN 27 11 9 20 0.741 0.0938 0.0938 0.1798 0.1798
2024-25 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 45 10 20 30 0.667 0.0849 0.0856 0.2109 0.2127
2025-26 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 47 16 36 52 1.106 0.1410 0.1350 0.3500 0.3351
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26912
Forward overall
#1525
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

New England College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brandon Fackey
0.79
actual FR PPG at New England College
Hayden Haldane
0.00
actual FR PPG at New England College
Trevor Turner
0.71
actual FR PPG at New England College
Jack Brennan
0.44
actual FR PPG at New England College

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Svicki
Canton · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Xavier Tremblay
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.