IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Patterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — USPHL-Premier 44 1 11 12 0.273 0.0357 0.0361 0.0926 0.0936
2024-25 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 40 14 23 37 0.925 0.1210 0.1152 0.3139 0.2989
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2024-25 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2023-24 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2022-23 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2021-22 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2020-21 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25965
Forward overall
#1469
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Cardwell
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Lenius
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eoin Reager
Post · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.