IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Foget Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Nepean Raiders CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Rockland Nationals CCHL 61 19 27 46 0.754 0.2152 0.2382 0.5837 0.6461
2014-15 Rockland Nationals CCHL 61 24 58 82 1.344 0.3837 0.4070 1.0406 1.1037
2016-17 Ottawa 67's OHL 32 12 21 33 1.031 0.6154 0.5768 2.6710 2.5033
2017-18 — OHL 68 22 39 61 0.897 0.5354 0.4746 2.3237 2.0599
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2015-16 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 34 5 7 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Merrimack
+21.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2307
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.