IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Charlebois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-02-18 Country: USA
2005 · Round 6, Pick #188  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 53 3 7 10 0.189 0.0409 0.0446 0.1460 0.1591
2003-04 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0306 0.0326 0.0879 0.0935
2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 59 1 24 25 0.424 0.2499 0.2503 1.2725 1.2746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 18 0 9 9 0.500
2007-08 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 38 1 8 9 0.237
2006-07 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 39 0 4 4 0.103
2005-06 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 32 2 3 5 0.156
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2005-06 · New Hampshire
1.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11567
Defenseman overall
#1236
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ruffin
Adrian · 2017-18
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.