← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lou Vesperini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack USPHL-Premier 15 2 6 8 0.533 0.0698 0.0755 0.1810 0.1958
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 37 1 20 21 0.568 0.1311 0.1311 0.2777 0.2777
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 7 7 14 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2020-21 · Calvin University
+622.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
100%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30142
Forward overall
#1588
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2004-05
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.