IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Colberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chicago T-Rex USPHL-Premier 40 9 11 20 0.500 0.1648 0.1648 0.1701 0.1701
2021-22 Chicago T-Rex USPHL-Premier 40 8 13 21 0.525 0.1730 0.1688 0.1786 0.1743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2024-25 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2023-24 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2022-23 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2021-22 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2020-21 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 1 4 5 0.185

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8842
Defenseman overall
#1985
Defenseman born in 2002
#2749
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Parent
Western New England · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drake Longaker
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2007-08
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.