← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Ogden Mustangs USPHL-Premier 44 6 13 19 0.432 0.0487 0.0487 0.1466 0.1466
2021-22 Ogden Mustangs USPHL-Premier 38 10 9 19 0.500 0.0564 0.0525 0.1698 0.1581
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35745
Forward overall
#1928
Forward born in 2001
#3077
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2024-25
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.