← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolas Schwab Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 35 8 10 18 0.514 0.0673 0.0673 0.1746 0.1746
2021-22 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 42 12 29 41 0.976 0.1277 0.1266 0.3313 0.3284
2022-23 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 49 17 33 50 1.020 0.1335 0.1258 0.3463 0.3262
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 18 5 2 7 0.389

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16680
Forward overall
#880
Forward born in 2002
#1024
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.