← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Hilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0135 0.0135 0.0351 0.0351
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 37 5 17 22 0.595 0.0778 0.0797 0.2018 0.2066
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 25 0 4 4 0.160 0.0652 0.0645 0.1286 0.1273
2023-24 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 4 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238
2024-25 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238
2023-24 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238
2022-23 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238
2021-22 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238
2020-21 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 21 4 1 5 0.238

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7138
Defenseman overall
#1680
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.