← New Search ↗ Social Card

Layne Brubaker-Egner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 41 29 27 56 1.366 0.2400 0.2400 0.3129 0.3129
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 34 20 15 35 1.029 0.1944 0.1881 0.2318 0.2243
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 21 1 5 6 0.286 0.1005 0.0980 0.1401 0.1367
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 6 12 18 0.600

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34536
Forward overall
#2067
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2010-11
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2010-11
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.