← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maverick Crupi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 USPHL-Premier 42 8 15 23 0.548 0.0716 0.0752 0.1859 0.1953
2022-23 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 41 21 32 53 1.293 0.1691 0.1693 0.4387 0.4392
2023-24 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 41 12 31 43 1.049 0.1372 0.1307 0.3560 0.3392
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 14 4 7 11 0.786

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13301
Forward overall
#626
Forward born in 2003
#703
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.