← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-13 Country: USA
Colby
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 39 1 4 5 0.128 0.0471 0.0473 0.1355 0.1361
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 15 6 5 11 0.733 0.2694 0.2572 0.7750 0.7398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 26 10 7 17 0.654
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 9 7 16 0.593
2014-15 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 20 3 4 7 0.350
2013-14 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 26 5 7 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2013-14 · Norwich
+211.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29680
Forward overall
#1091
Forward born in 1992
#2641
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.75
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.50
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.73
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.38
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2021-22
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.