← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Lozinak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0087 0.0087 0.0226 0.0226
2021-22 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 38 1 7 8 0.210 0.0275 0.0269 0.0714 0.0698
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0262 0.0243 0.0679 0.0630
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250
2020-21 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 32 3 5 8 0.250

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24776
Defenseman overall
#3714
Defenseman born in 2002
#6406
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2018-19
0.080 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2017-18
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.