← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Kruczek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 9 5 4 9 1.000 0.1308 0.1350 0.3394 0.3504
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 49 7 15 22 0.449 0.1831 0.1827 0.3609 0.3601
2023-24 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 23 12 13 25 1.087 0.2511 0.2415 0.5319 0.5115
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 20 11 13 24 1.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23723
Forward overall
#1297
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.