← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 39 11 16 27 0.692 0.0516 0.0516 0.1586 0.1586
2021-22 Hershey Cubs USPHL-Premier 36 6 2 8 0.222 0.0251 0.0260 0.0756 0.0782
2022-23 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 36 8 8 16 0.444 0.0650 0.0659 0.2179 0.2209
2023-24 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0308 0.0297 0.1032 0.0994
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46543
Forward overall
#3071
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.