← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Svoboda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 39 7 16 23 0.590 0.0544 0.0544 0.1350 0.1350
2021-22 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 37 0 8 8 0.216 0.0283 0.0290 0.0734 0.0751
2022-23 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 39 1 2 3 0.077 0.0101 0.0098 0.0261 0.0254
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 24 4 4 8 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24598
Defenseman overall
#3874
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2002-03
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2022-23
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.