← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Darlington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 38 27 16 43 1.132 0.1480 0.1537 0.3841 0.3988
2023-24 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0510 0.0508 0.1005 0.1001
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000
2024-25 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000
2023-24 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000
2022-23 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000
2021-22 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000
2020-21 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 35 13 22 35 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10714
Forward overall
#438
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2013-14
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.