IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Leistner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Pittsburgh Jr. Penguins NA3HL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0193 0.0206 0.0486 0.0519
2012-13 Pittsburgh Vengeance NA3HL 45 5 9 14 0.311 0.0390 0.0397 0.0982 0.1001
2013-14 Pittsburgh Vengeance NA3HL 47 7 19 26 0.553 0.0694 0.0680 0.1746 0.1711
2014-15 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 40 13 23 36 0.900 0.0831 0.0780 0.2061 0.1935
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE — 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Western New England
+160.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13124
Defenseman overall
#1639
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Prestia
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Hinterser
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Sheppard
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.