IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0963 0.0941 0.3643 0.3559
2010-11 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 44 10 9 19 0.432 0.1664 0.1548 0.6292 0.5853
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 19 1 4 5 0.263
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 21 2 2 4 0.191
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 14 2 0 2 0.143
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 15 2 4 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2011-12 · SUNY Geneseo
+258.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34704
Forward overall
#1266
Forward born in 1990
#1961
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nitkin
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.