IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Burket Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hershey Cubs USPHL-Premier 44 11 15 26 0.591 0.0773 0.0845 0.2006 0.2193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200
2024-25 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200
2023-24 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200
2022-23 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200
2021-22 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200
2020-21 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 3 3 6 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7176
Defenseman overall
#1719
Defenseman born in 2005
#2278
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Rhymer
SUNY Potsdam · 2004-05
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dawson Ellis
Adrian · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.