← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danylo Sovivskyi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-20 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 27 1 10 11 0.407 0.0716 0.0700 0.0933 0.0912
2022-23 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 43 1 9 10 0.233 0.0767 0.0746 0.0791 0.0770
2023-24 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0916 0.0847 0.0945 0.0874
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20958
Defenseman overall
#3507
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.