IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Suter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 58 5 8 13 0.224 0.1322 0.1410 0.6731 0.7181
2005-06 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 42 3 14 17 0.405 0.2388 0.2422 1.2158 1.2333
2006-07 Omaha Lancers USHL 17 0 5 5 0.294 0.1735 0.1671 0.8833 0.8506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 6 17 23 0.852
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 6 16 22 0.786
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 6 12 18 0.667
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 26 2 11 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+168.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8326
Defenseman overall
#1026
Defenseman born in 1987
#2962
in USHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2002-03
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2004-05
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.