← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Rastello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 16 3 4 7 0.438 0.0572 0.0595 0.1485 0.1544
2023-24 Metro Jets USPHL-Elite 35 7 19 26 0.743 0.0686 0.0648 0.1701 0.1606
2024-25 MJDP USPHL-Premier 36 2 8 10 0.278 0.0363 0.0339 0.0943 0.0880
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000
2024-25 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000
2023-24 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000
2022-23 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000
2021-22 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000
2020-21 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 1 1 0 1 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43509
Forward overall
#2882
Forward born in 2004
#4207
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2013-14
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2013-14
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.