← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zack Warner-Senee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-20 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Boston
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHLP 7 5 2 7 1.000 0.1147 0.1258 0.2254 0.2472
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.2310 0.2553 0.4892 0.5407
2024-25 Worcester Jr. Railers USPHL-Premier 38 20 28 48 1.263 0.1657 0.1690 0.4289 0.4375
2025-26 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 50 18 13 31 0.620 0.2528 0.2494 0.4961 0.4895
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13258
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

UMass Boston Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
0.65
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
1.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
0.41
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.