← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Tsiouvaras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.0678 0.0678 0.1301 0.1301
2020-21 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 16 3 1 4 0.250 0.0316 0.0316 0.0607 0.0607
2022-23 Red River Spartans USPHL-Premier 33 4 2 6 0.182 0.0238 0.0227 0.0617 0.0589
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 25 8 16 24 0.960
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2020-21 · New York University
+1555.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42518
Forward overall
#2668
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2014-15
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.