IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 50 0 8 8 0.160 0.0308 0.0308 0.1009 0.1010
2015-16 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 54 2 11 13 0.241 0.0463 0.0439 0.1518 0.1440
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA — 14 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA — 4 1 0 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2016-17 · Marian
+584.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24877
Defenseman overall
#2571
Defenseman born in 1995
#1927
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Atsoff
UMass Boston · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Gagnon
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.